September 15

It’s Complicated

When the people we call the Pilgrims- only about 22 of the 103 passengers on the Mayflower were actually Separatists Puritans. They called themselves the “Saints”. They called the other passengers, “The Strangers”. By the way, they weren’t called the Pilgrims until the 1800s. These “Saints” are held up as models to this day as evidenced by the video. Americans don’t celebrate our national founding at Thanksgiving with stories about Jamestown; instead Thanksgiving celebrates these “Saints”.

They were very brave people. No doubt about it. They knew that practicing their faith in England was putting their lives at risk. Eventually, as I said in class last week, they went to Holland which was far more tolerant of diverse religious beliefs. They were afraid their kids would lose their “Englishness” and so they set off to America. Which was almost akin to going to the moon with a one way ticket. They knew they’d never see home again. That’s brave.

In my musings below, I write nothing to purposely disparage these people.  The claims we make for them are not claims they make for themselves. The  most common/ silliest claim is that they came to establish religious freedom. (No! They came to establish a colony for their own religion. You couldn’t be anything else in Plymouth.) Instead, I want us to think about how we use history to make myths and heroes and what is left in and what is left out as we tell the story of America.

This textbook gets part of the story right and is similar to how basically all text books write about Plymouth. But it only tells  part of it. It acknowledges the Mayflower didn’t land in Virginia as intended. If anything, the argument that winter was coming as a reason to stay up North seems to prove the opposite point. If winter was coming, wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to go where there was food for them to eat?   Here’s the textbook’s account. 

“Are We There Yet?  “The Mayflower and Plymouth Colony [ushistory.org].” (http://www.ushistory.org/us/3a.asp. Accessed 15 Sep. 2019.)

One of the greatest twists of fate in human history occurred on that epochal voyage. The Pilgrims were originally bound for Virginia to live north of Jamestown under the same charter granted to citizens of Jamestown. Fate charted a different course. Lost at sea, they happened upon a piece of land that would become known as Cape Cod. After surveying the land, they set up camp not too far from PLYMOUTH ROCK. They feared venturing further south because winter was fast approaching. 

The Pilgrims had an important question to answer before they set ashore. Since they were not landing within the jurisdiction of the Virginia Company, they had no CHARTER to govern them. Who would rule their society?

In the landmark MAYFLOWER COMPACT OF 1620, the Pilgrims decided that they would rule themselves, based on majority rule of the townsmen. This independent attitude set up a tradition of self-rule that would later lead to TOWN MEETINGS and elected legislatures in New England.

Like the Virginia House of Burgesses established the previous year, Plymouth colony began to lay the foundation for democracy in the American colonies.”

Perhaps this Mayflower Compact was written to quell the uprising among the upset “Strangers”. It set up a the outline for just society by 17th century standards. Maybe this was enough to mollify the “Strangers” who were still hoping for Virginia. I’ve tried looking for the status of the passengers on the Mayflower to see if any were involuntary indentured servants. I’ve learned that there were 20 indentured servants. But I don’t know if they were voluntary or involuntary. I’d expect that involuntary servants would be less likely to want to go to Virginia. We know what that was like from Frethorne.

Anyway, the move to stay in Plymouth proved devastating because 45 of the 102 died before the end of the winter. Keep in mind that they were starving to death as you read further. Again, I am not trying to make these people out to be villains. Understand that they were starving. The following is from a diary written on November 30th, three weeks after landing. William Bradford wrote

They also found two of the Indian’s houses covered with mats, and some of their implements in them; but the people had run away and could not be seen. Without permission they took more corn, and beans of various colours. These they brought away, intending to give them full satisfaction (payment) when they should meet with any of them, – as about six months afterwards they did.

And it is to be noted as a special providence of God, and a great mercy to this poor people, that they thus got seed to plant corn the next year, or they might have starved; for they had none, nor any likelihood of getting any, till too late for the planting season.

 

Notice who gets the credit?  God! Not the Native Americans. Later, the Pilgrims grew even more desperate, and even though they admit quite openly to grave robbing, they can’t quite bring themselves to say it.

 

When we had marched five or six myles into the Woods, and could find no signes of any people, we returned againe another way, and as we came into the plaine ground, wee found a place like a graue, but it was much bigger and longer than any we had yet seene. It was also covered with boords, so as we mused what it should be, and resolved to digge it up, where we found, first a Matt, and under that a fayre Bow, and there another Matt, and under that a boord about three quarters long, finely carued and paynted, with three tynes, or broches on the top, like a Crowne; also betweene the Matts we found Boules, Trayes, Dishes, and such like Trinkets; at length we came to a faire new Matt, and vnder that two Bundles, the one bigger, the other lesse, we opened the greater and found in it a great quantitie of fine and perfect red Powder, and in it the bones and skull of a man. The skull had fine yellow haire still on it, and some of the flesh vnconsumed; there was bound vp with it a knife, a pack-needle, and two or three old iron things. . . . We opened the lesse bundle likewise, and found of the same Powder in it, and the bones and head of a little childe; about the leggs, and other parts of it was bound strings, and bracelets of fine white Beads; there was also by it a little Bow, about three quarters long, and some other odd knacks; we brought sundry of the pretiest things away with us, and covered the Corps

Finally, watch this.

 

Fi


Posted September 15, 2019 by amcdonnell in category Uncategorized

20 thoughts on “It’s Complicated

  1. Allison Foley

    Why were the Native Americans originally so hospitable towards the Pilgrims? Did the kindness come from naivety or was it strategic in order to get on the Pilgrims’ good side? Do most say that their hospitable nature, in the beginning, was beneficial or harmful to the Native Americans?

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      Good questions Allison, I think there were different motives. Basic human kindness was one of them. Others though would be to get and use English technology (guns and steel) against enemy native tribes. That clearly was the goal of Powatan in Virginia. He was hoping to use the English.

      Reply
  2. kayfoy

    I think that the people who wrote the history always try to make themselves look like the good guy and not the bad guy. Although it is said in the journal entry that they a place “like a grave” so as to seem to be doing something not as bad. I think with everyone who writes their history they make themselves out to seem like the hero/good guy.

    Reply
  3. rhananel

    I find it interesting that the pilgrims decided to make decisions as a whole town and did not decide to have one leader.

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      They did have a leader named Myles Standish. He was an English military advisor that they had hired. They left political decisions to him, but kept religious decisions for themselves.

      Reply
  4. Xander Giaccone

    I don’t think that grave robbing is inherently immoral, I odn’t believe in souls or religion and I think it says more to the greed of someone to believe that they should have there tings buried than someone who wishes to be conservative and efficient and repurpose those things.

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      it is still something frowned upon to say the least- grave robbing. Certainly the Pilgrims didn’t feel good about .

      Reply
  5. Ethan Rappaport

    The pilgrims, though desperate, stick to there core beliefs that God is responsible for all that is happening to them, and likewise for them taking the corn. I think the idea that God was in control, and that He was putting them through these trials to justify their sanctification, was comforting to them, and this idea of destiny is what kept them going through the winter.

    Reply
  6. vthompson

    I find it interesting that people feel the need to keep things hidden from the world like this. It’s especially annoying because it defeats the whole point of schooling if everything in the text books are un true. We have a whole holiday based on a lie. It’s not farfetched to say that basis of our existence rests upon a be of lies.

    Reply
  7. zalbertson

    I think it’s crazy that almost no credit was given to the Native Americans. It’s hard to imagine being that desperate to totally not acknowledge what a group of people have done for you and then go and literally rob them (from the graves). It’s definitely a hard situation to deal with but I still think they should’ve owned up to it and give the Native Americans what credit they deserved.

    Reply
  8. eholland

    It’s crazy how history can be shaped based of off one persons perspective. Prior to learning this I thought the english settlers were innocent.

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      Ed,
      I don’t think that these Pilgrims are bad people. They were dying. And so they stole from the dead who wouldn’t need it anyway. But still, you can tell they felt bad about it. And we hold these people up as heroes.. but we do not tell the whole story.

      Reply
  9. Aiden McLean

    Oh how history is told by the victors. What is left for me to say that hasn’t been said already. The Pilgrims were lucky that they survived, but also owe their survival to the Native Americans. Also some of the clips from the second video is from the tv show Mankind the Story of All of Us.

    Reply
  10. elillard

    Maybe the pilgrams were not used to seeing items inside a grave which is why they say, “like a grave.” This just goes to show how desperate they were to find food and items they could use for the winter. Why didn’t they try hunting? I cant imagine that there were no animals near the parts where they colonized.

    Reply
  11. Ryan Lynch

    This reading helped me gain a better understanding of the Pilgrims, and what they went through. I feel kind of bad for them because they had to leave their home to find a better life. I also had no idea that religion played a major role in Pilgrims journey.

    Reply
  12. Emma

    I find it particularity interesting how the pilgrims said that their unmoral actions were excused by God. I think this shows a lot about their morals and religious ways.

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      You’re a bit less forgiving than I. They really did want to do good- at least as they defined it. But they were also starving to death and to stay alive they did some desperate things.

      Reply
  13. Thomas Foley

    When the pilgrims called themselves “saints” and the others “strangers”, did they mean to act as if they were better than them because they were leaving their country for faith reasons?

    Reply
    1. amcdonnell (Post author)

      I think they thought they were more likely to be predestined to go to heaven and that they really were trying to live more Godly lives.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to kayfoy Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*